test: migrate math/base/special/asec to ULP-based testing

[Planeshifter]

Description

This PR migrates the test suite for math/base/special/asec from relative-tolerance testing to ULP difference testing, per the tracking issue.

• Replaced the EPS/abs-based tolerance checks with @stdlib/number/float64/base/assert/is-almost-same-value.
• All 8 fixture-based test blocks (medium/large/larger/huge, positive/negative) now use isAlmostSameValue( y, expected[ i ], 1 ).
• Measured the minimum required ULP bound empirically by comparing every fixture value's computed ULP difference against expected; the maximum observed difference across all ~4000 fixture values (test.js and test.native.js) was 1 ULP, so 1 is used as the tightest bound.
• Verified determinism by running the full suite twice at this bound with no flakiness.
• test/test.js and test/test.native.js were updated identically (the native test just skips when no native addon is built, unchanged from before).

Only the package's own test files were changed; no other files were modified.

Resolves a part of #11352

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

   - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

• The developer's certificate of origin
• Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

[stdlib-bot]

Hello! 👋

We've noticed that you've been opening a number of PRs addressing good first issues. Thank you for your interest and enthusiasm!

Now that you've made a few contributions, we suggest no longer working on good first issues. Instead, we encourage you to prioritize cleaning up any PRs which have yet to be merged and then proceed to work on more involved tasks.

Not only does this ensure that other new contributors can work on things and get ramped up on all things stdlib, it also ensures that you can spend your time on more challenging problems. 🚀

For ideas for future PRs, feel free to search the codebase for TODOs and FIXMEs and be sure to check out other open issues on the issue tracker. Cheers!

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/asec	$\\color{green}160/160$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}5/5$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}160/160$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

The OP needs to be updated as described in the comments.