docs: surface life sciences in research index - #1089
Open
Max17190 wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
Keep the life-science docs launch in one canonical PR by adding the verified CLI example and biomedical paper-id prefix guidance to the existing Research Index update.\n\nConstraint: Launch docs should stay on the existing Research Index surface without new endpoint, category, count, or source-family claims.\nRejected: Merging both #1088 and #1089 separately | The PRs overlap in the guide intro and would create duplicate review/merge churn.\nConfidence: high\nScope-risk: narrow\nDirective: Keep future biomedical examples tied to live-verified Research Index outputs.\nTested: git diff --check -- features/research.mdx api-reference/endpoint/research-search-papers.mdx; no localized files touched; no corpus count/source claims; MDX fence balance; live cURL CRISPR query returned PMCID/PMID results; live keyless CLI single-cell RNA-seq query returned PMCID results.\nNot-tested: Mintlify preview/build because mint is not installed locally.
nkeeley
reviewed
Jun 30, 2026
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This feels odd. What is a biomedical concept? Why do we specify life science research but not AI/ML reserach (which is also possible)?
I would honestly revert this one back to original.
nkeeley
reviewed
Jun 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
The Research Index docs should make it clear that agents can use the paper search endpoint for life-science literature, without repositioning the page as biopharma-specific or naming sources/corpus size.
Summary
firecrawl research search-papers "single-cell RNA-seq batch correction" --limit 20.arxiv:,pmid:,pmcid:, anddoi:.Test Plan
git diff --check -- features/research.mdx api-reference/endpoint/research-search-papers.mdxfeatures/research.mdxandapi-reference/endpoint/research-search-papers.mdxare touched.https://api.firecrawl.dev/v2/search/research/papers?query=CRISPR%20gene%20editing%20therapy&k=3returned relevant PMCID/PMID gene-therapy results.env -u FIRECRAWL_API_KEY npx -y firecrawl-cli@latest research search-papers "single-cell RNA-seq batch correction" --limit 3 --jsonreturned relevant PMCID batch-correction results.Note: Mintlify preview/build was not run locally because
mintis not installed.